Dr Parrish,
I was informed today that I that as a requirement for my ENGL 301 technical
writing class, I would be required to use turnitin.com as a requirement for
the course. While I have no qualms against my essays being graded and
checked for plagiarism, I do oppose their incorporation and use in a
commercial database for which a company is to profit from my works. I have
nothing to hide, and invite close inspection of my essays upon submission of
an assignment, but object to what essentially amounts to a company selling
derivations of my work with no monetary compensation for myself.
I have no problems documenting the origins of data that I collect, nor do I
have a problem with sharing my work with other parties. In fact, I generally
put my schoolwork online under a reasonable license, such as the BSD
documentation or creative commons license, complete with revisions of the
every step taken to compile the document. I do this since I am a strong
believer in open documentation practices which I have adopted from the
open-source documentation and software development philosophies. It is my
opinion that this is a better protection against plagiarism than any for-pay
service could offer, since the information is out there and its evolution
free for anyone to review, not just subscribers to an expensive service. The
underlying difference is that the information will always be disseminated
under my terms, not under an ever-changing corporate policy.
I acknowledge the need for ensuring the originality of work, even more-so
for an academic environment, but hope that there are other alternatives for
which I have not been presented with as of yet. If there is no
middle-ground, I will comply with the terms of the course, but plan on
presenting the turnitin.com service with DMCA takedown notices to the site
following the submission and grading of each assignment in order to recover
the rights to my work.
Please note that I have no objection to the retention and automated checking
of my essay against other students’ submissions for the purpose of this
class for this semester, previous semesters or in the future in the proper
context. However, only under the condition that the methodology used for
such checking is made freely available or otherwise open for public audit
and that the entire process is non-profit would I consider this appropriate.
I would even go so far as to offer to help develop such software in my free
time, should an unfulfilled need for it exist in the absence of the
turnitin.com service.
I apologize if I sound a bit rash in this letter, but copyright issues are
very important to me, especially in the field of computer engineering and
software development. I have no delusions that my works will stand at all
outside of the context of this course, but cannot acquiesce to a corporation
profiting from any of my academic work without compensation. I appreciate
the time that you have spent reading through and considering my viewpoint
and hope to hear back from you soon.
Regards,
William Reading